<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workaround</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kelson.wordpress.com/2005/10/21/workaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kelson.wordpress.com/2005/10/21/workaround/</link>
	<description>Weblog number five!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABA Publicity &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://kelson.wordpress.com/2005/10/21/workaround/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>ABA Publicity &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 05:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kelson.wordpress.com/2005/10/21/workaround/#comment-1</guid>
		<description>[...] In related news, I&#8217;ve finally broken down and added Flock to the list. Mainly I stayed away from it because I&#8217;d already listed 7 Gecko-based browsers (8 if you count SeaMonkey separately from the Mozilla Suite), and it seemed overkill to add one more. I first tried out Flock back in October, and while it seemed interesting, it didn&#8217;t really grab me. Now that it&#8217;s in beta, it looks like progress is solid, and it&#8217;s different enough from Firefox or SeaMonkey to warrant inclusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In related news, I&#8217;ve finally broken down and added Flock to the list. Mainly I stayed away from it because I&#8217;d already listed 7 Gecko-based browsers (8 if you count SeaMonkey separately from the Mozilla Suite), and it seemed overkill to add one more. I first tried out Flock back in October, and while it seemed interesting, it didn&#8217;t really grab me. Now that it&#8217;s in beta, it looks like progress is solid, and it&#8217;s different enough from Firefox or SeaMonkey to warrant inclusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
